Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leaders of the Free World (song)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. after Mattg82's improvements JohnCD (talk) 20:12, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Leaders of the Free World (song)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Empty. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:19, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Notable single by a notable band. Esp. if the claim it was the last V2 single too. At worst, redirect it to the album. Lugnuts (talk) 09:48, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and redirect Maybe with more content and an infobox I'd change my mind. andrewrox424 ^Bleep 12:28, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep With the infobox and added information I believe that this should stay. I added the cover art to help. andrewrox424 ^Bleep 15:01, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep The song charted at #53[1] in the uk. Needs infobox+cover pic, track listing, categorys & navbox, etc etc. Mattg82 (talk) 03:37, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:39, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:17, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails quality guidelines for articles. If the song charted, it's not in the article, and should ahve been placed there with verifiable references/cites by the article creator or contributors, and even then, may not be enough context to support quality guidelines of articles Alan - talk 23:35, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I've now added infobox, navbox, tracklist & chart table. Mattg82 (talk) 23:37, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.